Skip to content
Setcoin Group
Request access

Setcoin Intelligence · Space Infrastructure · Moon and Cislunar · Updated October 2026

Lunar, Cislunar and Settlement Economics: What the Moon Costs and Who Pays

What does each layer of the lunar economy cost, who pays for it, and what would it take to go from short visits to a permanent settlement? Sixty chapters on Artemis, landers, refuelling, cargo prices, power, communications, resources, law, China, and the cost of living on the Moon, built on NASA budgets and audits, contract records and Setcoin's own models.

Open to everyone: the first 3 chapters in full, with exhibits and models; a free account adds their Excel models. Space subscription: all 63 chapters, every model and Excel file, 7-day free trial, then €199 a month. Already a reader? Sign in.

Earth~3 days · 5.9 km/ssouth polelit ridge · shadowed crater
Chapters
60 + 3 appendices · 180 min
Interactive Models
5, with Excel
Data
NASA budgets, OIG and GAO, contract awards, mission records
Figures As Of
22 October 2026
~$1M
Per kg, small landers
1 of 6
Clean landings since 2023
~$1B
Per person-year, early base
180 min
Read, 60 chapters

In short

The Moon is still a government market priced per kilogram. Small commercial landers deliver payloads for about $0.7–1 million per kilogram, and only one of six commercial landing attempts since 2023 was a clean success. Starship- and Blue Moon-class landers could cut the cost floor to $3,800–100,000 per kilogram, but only once orbital refuelling works, which had not been demonstrated by October 2026. NASA flew Artemis II in April 2026, moved the first landing to Artemis IV in early 2028, paused Gateway and set out a $20 billion Moon Base with a reactor by 2030. Lunar propellant pays only above about 100 tonnes a year; a person-year in an early base costs about $1 billion.

01 · The answer

The Moon is a government market priced per kilogram.

Artemis II flew four astronauts around the Moon between 1 and 10 April 2026, the first crewed lunar flight since 1972. In February NASA restructured the programme: the first landing moved to Artemis IV in early 2028, Artemis III became a docking test in Earth orbit (third quarter of 2027), and in March Gateway was paused in favour of a $20 billion, seven-year Moon Base near the south pole with a reactor by 2030.

Cargo is bought by the kilogram. NASA's commercial landers cost $47–322 million per mission for tens to hundreds of kilograms, about $0.7–1 million per kilogram. Only one of six commercial landing attempts since 2023 was a clean success, so the price of a kilogram that actually works is about twice the contract price on Setcoin's portfolio model.

Heavy landers change the arithmetic. On Setcoin's delivery cost model, a Starship-class cargo lander has a cost floor of about $13,000 per kilogram at today's launch prices and $3,800 at mature reuse, against $733,000 for a small lander. Both crewed landers depend on orbital refuelling, which had not been tried at scale by October 2026: it is the single largest schedule risk.

Living there is a transport problem. An early four-person base costs about $1 billion per person-year, two-thirds of it crew seats; a 100-person settlement would need seats near $20 million, cargo near $2,000 per kilogram and 98% recycling to reach about $40 million. Lunar propellant pays only above about 100 tonnes a year and while Earth delivery stays above about $3,000 per kilogram.

The study, chapter by chapter

60 chapters + 3 appendices · 180 min · updated 2026-10-22

  1. Executive Summary and Reading Guide
  2. Method: from Mission to Cost Stack
  3. Why the Moon, Again: Policy, Accords and Rivalry
  4. What Apollo Teaches About Lunar Cost
  5. Artemis in October 2026: What Has Flown, What Has Moved
  6. SLS and Orion: the Cost of the Government Stack
  7. A Crewed Landing Mission, Line by Line
  8. Human Landing Systems: Starship and Blue Moon
  9. The Refuelling Problem: Why Lander Cost Hides in Tanker Flights
  10. Gateway: from Lunar Station to Spare Parts
  11. NASA's Lunar Money: FY2026, FY2027 and the Reconciliation Law
  12. CLPS: the Record of Commercial Landers, 2019–2026
  13. Why Landers Fail
  14. Case Study: Blue Ghost Mission 1, Anatomy of a Clean Landing
  15. Case Study: IM-1 and IM-2, Landing on the Edge
  16. What a Kilogram on the Moon Costs Today
  17. The Delivery Cost Stack: Launch, Transfer, Landing, Operations
  18. The Gear Ratio: the Rocket Equation for Decision-Makers
  19. Heavy Cargo: Starship, Blue Moon and Argonaut
  20. The Procurement Pipeline: Moon Base Awards and CLPS 2.0
  21. Insurance and Risk Transfer for Lunar Missions
  22. Cislunar Transport: Orbits, Tugs and Relays
  23. Communications and Navigation: LunaNet, Moonlight and Queqiao
  24. Surviving the Night: the 354-Hour Problem
  25. Surface Power: Solar, Batteries, RTGs and Fission
  26. Lunar Reactor-1: Fission Power on the Moon by 2030
  27. Mobility: the Lunar Terrain Vehicle and Pressurised Rovers
  28. Dust, Radiation and Thermal Extremes: the Environment Tax
  29. NASA's Moon Base Plan: Three Phases, $20 Billion
  30. Water Ice: Evidence versus Hype
  31. Oxygen, Metals and Building Materials from Regolith
  32. Helium-3: Market, Price and Physics
  33. ISRU Propellant: Making Fuel on the Moon versus Shipping It
  34. ISRU Break-Even: When Local Propellant Pays
  35. Mining Law and Property Rights
  36. Safety Zones and the Crowded South Pole
  37. Science Demand: What Scientists Want from the Moon
  38. Commercial Demand Beyond NASA
  39. The Lunar Economy in 2035: a Market Map
  40. The Companies: Who Builds the Lunar Economy
  41. China's Lunar Programme: Chang'e, Mengzhou and Lanyue
  42. The ILRS and the Two Lunar Blocs
  43. The Race: Who Lands Crew First, and Does It Matter?
  44. Europe: Argonaut, Moonlight and Astronaut Seats
  45. Japan and India
  46. Other Nations: Gulf States, Korea, Israel, Canada and Others
  47. Habitats: Options and Mass
  48. Life Support Closure and Logistics Mass per Person-Year
  49. Construction on the Moon: Pads, Berms and Printed Shells
  50. The Cost of a Person-Year on the Moon
  51. Health, Medicine and Crew Time
  52. Settlement Scenarios, 2040–2060
  53. Who Would Pay for a Settlement
  54. Mars as a Comparison
  55. Implications by Reader
  56. Due-Diligence Checklist for a Lunar Company or Programme
  57. Risk Register
  58. Signals to Watch and What Would Change Our View
  59. Twenty Questions This Study Answers
  60. Methodology and Sources
  61. Appendix A: Lunar Landing Attempts, 2013–2026
  62. Appendix B: Glossary
  63. Appendix C: Model Reference Values

02 · The evidence

Four Numbers Behind the Lunar Economy

Artemis II launching on the Space Launch System, 1 April 2026 (NASA)

$4.1B

SLS and Orion per launch

NASA Inspector General estimate for Artemis I–IV, before the lander

Firefly's Blue Ghost Mission 1 on its Falcon 9 before launch (NASA)

$590M

Moon Base lander awards, June 2026

Four deliveries in late 2028 to Astrobotic, Firefly and Intuitive Machines

Fission surface power test hardware at NASA Glenn (NASA)

354 h

Lunar night at the equator

5 kW through it needs ~15 t of batteries or ~0.75 t of reactor (Setcoin model)

Mosaic of the lunar south pole from orbit (NASA)

76

Artemis Accords signatories

September 2026; China's ILRS has 13–17 members

03 · The price of a kilogram

What a Kilogram on the Moon Costs

Setcoin's delivery cost model: payload and lander mass times the rocket-equation gear ratio (about 5.3 from low Earth orbit with methane engines), times the launch price, plus the lander and operations. A cost floor, not a price.

Cost floor per kilogram landed, by lander class

$ per kg landed, log scale

Small commercial lander (150 kg)~$733,000
Medium lander (500 kg)~$363,000
Blue Moon MK1-class (3 t)~$99,000
Starship-class, early ($1,000/kg launch)~$13,200
Starship-class, mature ($200/kg launch)~$3,840

Setcoin delivery cost model; inputs in the study's Appendix C.

Try the model

Price a kilogram on the Moon

Start from a small commercial lander and switch to heavier landers, cheaper launch, hydrogen engines or reuse. On a small lander launch is about a tenth of the cost; on a Starship-class lander it is most of it.

Interactive model

Delivery cost stack: what does a kilogram on the Moon cost?

From launch price, lander mass, engine efficiency and reuse, what does one kilogram of payload landed on the lunar surface cost?

Scenarios
$733,149Cost per kg landed
5.32Gear ratio (kg in LEO per kg landed)
4.0 tMass in low Earth orbit
9.1%Launch share of mission cost
Small lander$733,149
Medium lander$362,548
MK1-class cargo$98,578
Starship-class, early$13,201
Starship-class, mature$3,840
Your case$733,149
$ per kg landed (log scale): reference landers at your Δv, engine and reuse, and your case
Show the calculation table
ItemValue
Gear ratio5.319
Mass in LEO (kg)3,989
Launch cost ($M)10
Lander cost per flight ($M)70
Operations ($M)30
Total per mission ($M)110
Cost per kg landed ($)733,149
Sensitivity: which input moves the answer most

What moves “Cost per kg landed” most: each input 20% lower (left of a pair) and 20% higher

Payload landed+179,963 / −119,975
Lander build cost−100,000 / +100,000
Mission operations and insurance−40,000 / +40,000
Engine specific impulse+33,035 / −15,835
Δv from low Earth orbit to the surface−19,158 / +26,913
Launch price to low Earth orbit−13,296 / +13,296
Lander dry mass−10,637 / +10,637
Gear ratio = e^(Δv ÷ (Isp × 9.80665 m/s²)): kilograms in low Earth orbit per kilogram landed.Mass in LEO = (payload + lander dry mass) × gear ratio. Launch cost = mass in LEO × launch price.Total = launch + lander cost ÷ flights + operations. $ per kg = total ÷ payload. A cost floor, not a price: development recovery, margins and failures come on top.

This is one of 5 interactive models in the report. The first 3 chapters of the report are open to everyone; a Space subscription, with a 7-day free trial, opens every model and its Excel file.

04 · Three findings

Where the Lunar Economy Really Stands

From NASA budgets and audits, contract records and mission outcomes, October 2026.

Apollo 15 astronaut James Irwin at the lunar roving vehicle (NASA)
1 clean of 6

Landing is still hard

Since 2023 two commercial landers tipped, three failed and one landed cleanly. Most failures began with navigation sensors. Governments landed six of eight attempts since 2013; China landed every one.

Artist's concept of SpaceX's Starship lander on the Moon (NASA)
Not yet tried

Refuelling is the critical path

Both crewed landers must be refuelled in orbit. SpaceX's ship-to-ship transfer had not been attempted after Flight 13 in July 2026; every quarter it slips moves the first landing.

A solar concentrator for a carbothermal regolith-oxygen test at NASA (NASA)
100 t a year

Ice is real; mines are not yet

Water ice sits in polar craters at 0.5–5% grades. On Setcoin's model, a lunar propellant plant beats shipping only above about 100 tonnes a year and while cargo costs more than about $3,000 per kilogram.

Try the model

Batteries or a reactor?

Keep 5 kW alive through a 354-hour equatorial night: about 15 tonnes of solar arrays and batteries, or about 0.75 tonnes of reactor. Move to a polar ridge with 100 hours of darkness, scale to 40 kW, or try better batteries.

Interactive model

Night power: batteries or a reactor?

What mass must be landed to keep a base powered through the lunar night with solar arrays and batteries, and with fission?

Scenarios
15 tSolar + batteries mass
0.75 tFission mass
19.9×Solar + batteries ÷ fission
$710MDelivery cost saved by fission
Batteries Solar14,750 kg · $738M
Solar arrays Solar200 kg · $10M
Solar + batteries, total Solar14,950 kg · $748M
Fission system Fission750 kg · $38M
Landed mass, kg (delivery at $50,000/kg shown)
Show the calculation table
ItemValue
Energy stored per night (kWh)1,770
Battery mass (kg)14,750
Array size (kW)10
Array mass (kg)200
Solar + batteries (kg)14,950
Fission (kg)750
Delivery, solar + batteries ($M)747.5
Delivery, fission ($M)37.5
Sensitivity: which input moves the answer most

What moves “Solar + batteries mass” most: each input 20% lower (left of a pair) and 20% higher

Battery specific energy (system)+3,688 / −2,458
Depth of discharge+3,404 / −2,329
Power needed through the night−2,990 / +2,990
Longest darkness−2,936 / +1,930
Solar array mass−40.0 / +40.0
Daylight hours to recharge+24.6 / −16.5
Battery mass = power × hours of darkness ÷ (specific energy × depth of discharge).Arrays run the base and recharge the batteries in daylight: array kW = power × (1 + darkness ÷ daylight).Fission mass = power × kg per kWe. Delivery cost = mass × delivery price. Reactor development cost is not included.

This is one of 5 interactive models in the report. The first 3 chapters of the report are open to everyone; a Space subscription, with a 7-day free trial, opens every model and its Excel file.

05 · Who builds it

Where the Lunar Economy Is Built

Agencies, lander and rover makers and launch sites behind the missions in this study. Ringed: builders of a crewed lander or crew programme. Switch between world, North America, Europe and Asia.

Crewed lander or crew programme · hover or tap a site for detail

All 19 sites, by category

Agencies and state programmes

  • NASA Johnson / HQ (US) ◎ — Artemis, HLS, Moon Base programme management
  • CMSA / CAST, Beijing (China) ◎ — Chang'e, Mengzhou, Lanyue; crewed landing before 2030
  • ISRO, Bengaluru (India) — Chandrayaan-3, -4, -5/LUPEX

Lander and rover makers

  • SpaceX Starbase (US) ◎ — Starship HLS; uncrewed lunar landing target late 2027
  • Blue Origin, Kent (US) ◎ — Blue Moon MK1 and MK2
  • Intuitive Machines, Houston (US) — Nova-C landers; lunar relay services
  • Firefly Aerospace, Cedar Park (US) — Blue Ghost landers; Elytra
  • Astrobotic, Pittsburgh (US) — Griffin lander (Voyager Technologies since Jul 2026)
  • Lunar Outpost, Golden (US) — Lunar terrain vehicle
  • Venturi Astrolab, Hawthorne (US) — Lunar terrain vehicle; FLIP rover
  • ESA / Thales Alenia Space, Turin (Italy) — Argonaut lander (€862M); habitat modules
  • Airbus, Bremen (Germany) ◎ — European Service Module for Orion
  • SSTL, Guildford (UK) — Lunar Pathfinder relay
  • JAXA / Toyota (Japan) — Pressurised rover 'Lunar Cruiser'
  • ispace, Tokyo (Japan) — Landers; Missions 3–4 2027 at earliest

Launch sites for lunar missions

  • Kennedy Space Center / Cape Canaveral (US) — SLS, Falcon 9/Heavy, New Glenn (LC-36 damaged May 2026)
  • Guiana Space Centre (Kourou) — Ariane 6 (Argonaut launcher)
  • Wenchang (China) — Long March 5 and 10 launches
  • Sriharikota (India) — LVM3 launches

Agency and company statements; examples, not a complete list.

Try the model

What does a person-year on the Moon cost?

An early four-person base: about $976 million per person-year, two-thirds of it seats. Switch to the mid-2030s Moon Base, a 40-person research town or a 100-person settlement to see which levers matter: seats, stay length and crew size first; recycling above 90% least.

Interactive model

Person-year cost: what does living on the Moon cost?

What does it cost to keep one person on the lunar surface for a year, and which lever lowers it most?

Scenarios
$976MCost per person-year
Crew transport (62.3%)Largest component
1,527 kgShipped per person-year
$3.91BBase cost a year (all crew)
Crew transport$608M · 62.3%
Base capital (spread)$167M · 17.1%
Ground operations$125M · 12.8%
Resupply$76M · 7.8%
$M per person-year, by component
Show the calculation table
ItemValue
Shipped kg per person-day4.18
Shipped kg per person-year1,527
Resupply ($M)76.4
Base capital share ($M)166.7
Ground share ($M)125
Round trips per person-year2.03
Crew transport ($M)608.3
Total per person-year ($M)976.4
Sensitivity: which input moves the answer most

What moves “Cost per person-year” most: each input 20% lower (left of a pair) and 20% higher

Rotation length+152 / −101
Seat price (round trip)−122 / +122
Crew on the surface+97.2 / −58.3
Base life+41.7 / −27.8
Base capital cost−33.3 / +33.3
Ground operations−25.0 / +25.0
Delivery price to the surface−15.3 / +15.3
Water and oxygen recycling+12.6 / −7.0
Spares and other supplies−7.3 / +7.3
Shipped kg per person-day = 1.8 (food) + 3.84 × (1 − recycling) + spares; 3.84 = 0.84 kg oxygen + 3.0 kg water.Resupply = kg a year × delivery price. Base share = capital ÷ life ÷ crew. Ground share = ground cost ÷ crew. Transport = (365 ÷ rotation days) × seat price.Person-year cost = transport + base share + ground share + resupply.

This is one of 5 interactive models in the report. The first 3 chapters of the report are open to everyone; a Space subscription, with a 7-day free trial, opens every model and its Excel file.

06 · Signals to watch

The Next 24 Months

  1. Late 2026Griffin-1 lands, or notAstrobotic's lander with Astrolab's FLIP rover: a second clean commercial landing would reset confidence.
  2. 2026–2027Starship propellant transferThe test both the 2027 uncrewed landing and the 2028 crewed landing depend on.
  3. Q3 2027Artemis III docking testCrew docks with prototype landers in Earth orbit; decides who flies Artemis IV.
  4. 2027China's Long March 10 and Mengzhou-1The pace of China's crewed landing before 2030.

07 · Check it yourself

Test This Study Against the Live Record

The lunar economy runs on contracts and the companies that hold them. These Setcoin services let you check them yourself.

Setcoin Verify

Know who you rely on

Registrations, ownership, charges, sanctions listings and court records on a lander maker, supplier or partner, in one cited report.

See what Verify checks →
Capital Map

Who funds space infrastructure

Capital groups that back space and deep-tech infrastructure, by sector, stage, structure and ticket size.

Explore Capital Map →
Setcoin Sectors

Who is being paid to build

Cited R&D awards and prime contracts in space and aerospace, by organisation and readiness gate, from public procurement and grant records.

Open the space sector record →

08 · The full study

What's Inside

Why the Moon and getting there

  • Policy, the Artemis Accords and what Apollo teaches about cost
  • Artemis after the 2026 restructuring; SLS and Orion; a crewed mission line by line
  • Starship and Blue Moon; refuelling; Gateway; NASA's budgets
  • Commercial landers: record, failures, two case studies, prices, the cost stack, insurance

Working on the surface and resources

  • Communications, the lunar night, power and Lunar Reactor-1
  • Rovers, the environment tax and NASA's $20 billion Moon Base
  • Water ice, oxygen and metals, helium-3, propellant and its break-even
  • Mining law, safety zones and the crowded south pole

Players and settlement

  • Science and commercial demand; the 2035 market map; the companies
  • China, the ILRS, the race; Europe, Japan, India and others
  • Habitats, life support, construction, health and the person-year
  • Settlement scenarios to 2060, who would pay, Mars; checklist, risks, signals
Transport

Delivery cost stack

Launch price, lander mass, engine efficiency and reuse turned into the cost of a kilogram on the lunar surface.

Power

Night power

Batteries or a reactor: the landed mass needed to keep a base alive through up to 354 hours of darkness.

Settlement

Person-year cost

Seats, rotations, recycling, cargo price and base cost combined into the cost of one person living on the Moon for a year.

Free data tools

Check the live record yourself

The study's findings move with launches, contracts and filings. These free Setcoin tools show the current public record behind them, refreshed from the catalogues and procurement registers.

Free tool

Space Contracts & Tender Radar

607 new US federal space awards and European tenders from the last twelve months, by part or service bought, buyer, country and stage, with the tenders still open.

See new exploration & lunar awards, most of them from NASA.

Open the radar →
Free tool

Space Claim Check

Type an operator’s name and see what the public satellite catalogues record: satellites launched, in orbit, operating and re-entered. The full check adds US contracts, SBIR awards, UK and NOAA licences and list screening.

Check a lander or spacecraft company’s flight record in the catalogues.

Check an operator →

Questions

Questions About the Study, Answered

When will astronauts land on the Moon again?

NASA targets Artemis IV in early 2028 for the first crewed landing since 1972, after a crewed docking test with prototype landers in Earth orbit (Artemis III) in the third quarter of 2027. China targets a crewed landing before 2030. Setcoin puts the chance of a US landing by the end of 2028 at about 35% and by 2030 at about 75%.

What happened to Artemis III?

In February 2026 NASA moved the first landing from Artemis III to Artemis IV. Artemis III became a crewed Orion flight in Earth orbit that docks with test versions of SpaceX's and Blue Origin's landers; NASA's October 2026 chart shows it in the third quarter of 2027.

How much does it cost to land a kilogram on the Moon?

On NASA's small commercial landers, about $0.7–1 million per kilogram of payload, based on task orders of $47–322 million per mission. Setcoin's delivery cost model gives a cost floor of about $99,000 per kilogram for a 3-tonne cargo lander and $3,800–13,200 for a Starship-class lander, depending on launch price.

Is the Gateway lunar space station cancelled?

NASA paused Gateway in March 2026 and its FY2027 budget request asks for no discretionary Gateway funding, moving the money to a lunar base. Hardware is being reused: HALO's power and avionics for three surface demonstrations, and the Power and Propulsion Element for a nuclear-electric Mars demonstrator.

What is NASA's Moon Base plan?

Announced in March 2026: about $20 billion over seven years for a base near the lunar south pole, in three phases. Phase 1 (to 2029) is robotic, with about 25 launches and 21 landings; phase 2 (about 2029–2032) adds habitats and crews about twice a year; phase 3 (from 2032) aims at permanent presence with heavy deliveries of about 150 tonnes.

Why does the lunar night matter so much?

Most places on the Moon have about 354 hours of darkness at a stretch, below −170 °C. On Setcoin's model, keeping 5 kW running through it takes about 15 tonnes of solar arrays and batteries, or about 0.75 tonnes of fission reactor. That is why NASA chose the south pole, where some ridges are lit 80–90% of the time, and a reactor by 2030.

How much water ice is on the Moon?

Published estimates range from about 100 million to 1 billion tonnes per pole, held in permanently shadowed craters. LCROSS measured about 5.6% water by mass in one impact plume, but local grades of 0.5–4% are more common, and no mission has yet drilled into ice-rich ground. The resource is real; minable deposits are unproven.

Is helium-3 mining on the Moon a real business?

There are real buyers at small scale: one company, Interlune, reports about $500 million of purchase orders, including up to 10,000 litres a year from 2028 for quantum-computer cooling, at about $3,000 per litre (roughly $20 million per kilogram). Its target is 10 kg a year in the 2030s, which needs about a million tonnes of regolith a year.

What would a person-year on the Moon cost?

On Setcoin's model, about $1 billion per person-year for an early four-person base with $300 million seats and six-month rotations, close to the ISS. About $540 million for an eight-person base in the mid-2030s, and about $40 million for a 100-person settlement with $20 million seats, two-year stays, 98% recycling and $2,000-per-kilogram cargo.

How do I read the full study?

The first three chapters are open to everyone in full, with no account; the rest can be previewed. A space sector subscription, with a free trial, opens all 60 chapters, the five interactive models and their Excel files.

Setcoin Research analyses public markets, filings and programmes for information only. It is not investment advice and does not recommend any security.

Read Lunar Economy

1. Read the first 3 chapters in full, no account needed. 2. Create a free account (two minutes, no card) to download their Excel models. 3. Subscribe to Space for every chapter, model and Excel download: 7-day free trial, then €199 a month or €1,490 a year.